Diet and dietary re-education go together when it comes to healthy lifestyle and weight loss. However, despite the initial association, it should be noted that these two topics have little in common.
Both alternatives have advantages and disadvantages with respect to aesthetic and health objectives, and without a doubt, at some point, it is necessary to unite these two concepts so that the best results are achieved in a safe manner.
Before we continue, we must mention that consultation with a nutritionist is advisable before any change in your diet.
Therefore, be sure to have a professional follow-up before starting your weight loss or muscle gain program.
Below, we will talk more about the topic, informing the advantages of each diet and dietary reeducation, and explaining why you should be concerned and understand in depth each of these terms.
Ready to find out more? Continue reading until the end!
The difference between diet and dietary education
At first, diet is the nomenclature used to inform the eating habits of a living being.
Another common association for this term is the idea of ”regime” or restrictions (or guidelines), commonly used for weight loss, muscle gain or normalization of some biological marker, such as cholesterol.
Food re-education means that the individual must literally learn to eat correctly, better understanding the acceptable portions for each type of food and the best choices for their quality of life.
In large part, food re-education goes hand in hand with good nutrition. However, a clear distinction needs to be made: in food reeducation, flexibility is encouraged and there is hardly any restriction in a more rigid way.
In a diet, it is possible that even a macronutrient, such as carbohydrates, is removed from the diet.
The advantages and disadvantages of each approach
In principle, the two alternatives show positive results. However, it is important to be aware of the particularities of each one and understand what it is that you really need to achieve your goals.
The positive and negative aspects of the diet
In the case of diets, restrictions are essential to achieve weight loss or decrease any biological marker that may cause damage to health.
There are no shortcuts. Therefore, if we only think about food reeducation to guarantee results, we may fail due to the lack of stricter control.
However, all this stricter control can prove to be exhausting in the long run, making diets often solutions with reduced “duration” for most people.
This is especially true for those who have no control over portions and quality of food.
The positive and negative aspects of food re-education
Food reeducation, on the other hand, can begin to generate new eating habits over time, making the individual start to make better and better choices based on his knowledge of food and his body.
The choices are not based on restrictions, but on what really matters to the organism. Changing a regular soft drink to a “zero” one (in moderation) can already bring about good changes, as well as choosing another healthier drink.
The idea is, over time – and without clear restrictions – to modify behavior to start feeling good.
The problem is that when we do this, we lose the effectiveness of a one-off diet and that it routinely generates more aesthetic and health results in a short time.
As we have seen, the best alternative for your health is a mixture of the two concepts. A good diet depends on good eating habits, as well as a reasonable control over the foods that are eaten over time.
It is worth mentioning that neither option will guarantee excellent results if physical exercises are not practiced. After all, this is another important variable for quality of life and health in the short, medium and long term.
Did you like the post on diet and dietary reeducation? Share it on social networks!